Thursday, April 3, 2014

MMD-0018-2014 - Analysis note: "Upatre" is back to SSL?

Latest Progress/Changes/Updates:

The background

Following the previous blog (link) of Zeus P2P Gameover (GMO) malware delivered by the Upatre trojan downloader from some encrypted form with varied file extension names. Today I found that the threat returned to previous model of Upatre downloader scheme (via SSL). Just in case I post it here, is not a new stuff, hope can help some friends:

The spam sample is like this:

*) The attached executable samples can be viewed at the bottom of this post.

The Upatre binary analysis

Some notes of the attached archived PE:

Compile Time: "0x533C67DB [Wed Apr 02 19:41:15 2014 UTC]"
Identified compiler : "Microsoft Visual C++ 5.0/6.0"
Entry Point at section: ".text"
CRC Fail: "Claimed 90984, Actual 77672"
Sigs: "Verified:Unsigned, Publisher: n/a"
Bad Entropy: ".text
              Flags: IMAGE_SCN_CNT_CODE, IMAGE_SCN_MEM_EXECUTE, IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ
              Entropy: 6.336388 (Min=0.0, Max=8.0)
              MD5: 28f4e63b3406fb9343aaf369f1897fb0"
I also use our beloved PeStudio downloaded from winitor.com for the reliable alert's check:

Some suspicious/blacklisted calls used:

" GetStartupInfoW   .rdata: 0x000035D8,kernel32.dll
  GetModuleHandleW  .rdata: 0x000035C4,kernel32.dll
  _controlfp        .rdata: 0x000035B6,msvcrt.dll"

// Note about MSVCRT.DLL
is the Microsoft Visual C Run-Time Library (and MSVCPP.DLL is the standard C++ library)
 for Visual C++ version 4.2 to 6.0. It provides programs compiled with these versions o
 f Visual C++ a typical set of library functions required by C and C++ programs. These i
 nclude string manipulation, memory allocation, C-style input/output calls, etc. The msv
 crt.dll is now a "known DLL," meaning that it is a system component owned and built by 
 Windows. It is intended for future use only by system-level components.
So.. combined with the below's system's used "internals calls"... this "software" is likely never good..
"_wcmdln         .rdata: 0x0000351A,msvcrt.dll
__wgetmainargs   .rdata: 0x00003524,msvcrt.dll
_initterm        .rdata: 0x00003536,msvcrt.dll
__setusermatherr .rdata: 0x00003542,msvcrt.dll
_adjust_fdiv     .rdata: 0x00003556,msvcrt.dll
__p__commode     .rdata: 0x00003566,msvcrt.dll
__set_app_type   .rdata: 0x00003584,msvcrt.dll
_except_handler3 .rdata: 0x00003596,msvcrt.dll
_XcptFilter      .rdata: 0x00003504,msvcrt.dll
__p__fmode       .rdata: 0x00003576,msvcrt.dll" 
...But yet, some known software made by Microsoft Visual C also having the traces of them, hmm..I'll stick to "suspicious" then :

The Upatre binary contains encrypted (or obfuscated?) data in here:

.text:00401870   dd 498D10h, 0F1708305h, 0FF8B04h, 0AC7FF60h, 8D0004E8h
.text:00401870   dd 45C150CCh, 8BFFFF8Dh, 0F811082h, 4242483h, 6F006300h
.text:00401870   dd 8B01E8FFh, 40420D4h, 8D00248Bh, 0F8107D83h, 3300E8FFh
.text:00401870   dd 0F8037E01h, 48B24E8h, 2025A09h, 8B018D8Dh, 412C00h
.text:00401870   dd 0FFFF33FFh, 0DC188261h, 12401FFh, 0A00C0408h, 8BFF0104h
.text:00401870   dd 700C150Dh, 1FF2400h, 0F4F022DBh, 8B000133h, 0E17300E1h
                    [...]
.text:00401870   dd 2 dup(1F001Fh), 0FF00001Fh, 324B32h, 13E08D00h, 0FF1F001Fh
.text:00401870   dd 2 dup(1F001Fh), 0
.text:00401C54   dd 68014816h, 3 dup(1F001F00h), 0FF1F001Fh, 0F06492h, 2 dup(1F001Fh)
.text:00401C54   dd 0FF001Fh, 1F1FFF00h, 4026F155h, 2 dup(1F001F00h), 0A201A241h
.text:00401C54   dd 1F001Fh, 6E614865h, 1F00FF00h, 1FFFh, 2 dup(1F001F00h)
.text:00401C54   dd 0E815701h, 1C001014h, 4081804h, 100008h, 18080404h
                    [...]
.text:00401C54   dd 0C900F8h, 0D400EAh, 0ED00E0h, 0D000C9h, 0AA0095h, 890076h
.text:00401C54   dd 6C0093h, 83007Ch, 8F0070h, 0D100EEh, 94002Bh, 0C600F9h
.text:00401C54   dd 60079h
.text:0040229C   db 0C0h, 0  // closing chunk.
Note: I tend to call it encrypted since it needs a XOR key to decrypt it. There are some more obfuscated data in other places too (in .data, .rdata, and .rsrc), but this binary is a case of encrypted PE.

If we solve the above obfuscation (which I can not) it should give codes for method to decrypt the encrypted traffic, downloads malware from assigned hosts. If you don't have disassembly you can use the raw disassembler result from IDA free version I pasted here--> (link) to start the reversing process.

Another note: the "start" point is in .text section, it checks environment there (plus few evasion tricks) and go to wWinMain which contains the real deal of decrypting the obfuscated data. In the wWinMain I can see a below interesting checking pattern after XOR:

"deobfuscation pattern, repeated more than one..
 (three times actually with different used registers")
[...]
push    edi
pop     edx
mov     eax, [ebp+var_60]
rol     eax, 6
add     eax, 455E4A5h
mov     [ebp+var_3C], eax
mov     edx, 136C6E9Bh
mov     [ebp+var_1C], edx
mov     ecx, 7E0C0B9Ah
mov     [ebp+var_68], ecx
mov     eax, 668758F1h
mov     [ebp+var_14], eax
mov     edx, 5D1E4FCDh
mov     [ebp+var_18], edx
mov     ecx, 0FFFFFFFFh
mov     [ebp+var_C], ecx
call    sub_4015A0  [...]    <=== "xor'ed and checked"

"called checks to sub_4015A0: "
push    ebx
push    esi
push    edi
mov     ebx, [ebp-80h]
xor     ebx, 0ABED8791h  <======
mov     edx, 40000000h
ror     edx, 0Eh
cmp     ebx, edx   // the checks.
jb      sub_401464 // end stuff here...

How does it work?

This is what I saw. The Upatre during execution is communicating to below host:

kionic,com / 64,92,125,121 (Netfronts/U.S.A.)

via TLSv1 (SSL):

which fetching the microsoft certification patch's URL and Comodo's encryption certification's URL:

Next, these data will trigger each URL in the list to be downloaded by the Upatre itself as per shown below:

Some reference for you of the explanation what was downloaded from the microsoft site:


Is a patch to revoke certification, was intended to make sure the following Comodo certification can be installed successfully:

This is the one that can be downloaded successfully:

Next.. Upatre downloads a binary blob via an encrypted communication (SSL) from kionic.com (64.92.125.121):

To be more viewable:

The downloaded malware is to be saved and registered (autorun) in:

// drops:
C:\Documents and Settings\%USER%\Local Settings\Temp\Ixtya (RANDOM)
2004/08/08  12:58  646,656 dyzucy.exe (random) 0929a17a3fbaf6b1eb63ab8d5edbdd45

// registry..
Key: HKCU\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
Data: "dyzucy.exe" (RANDOM), Values: "C:\Documents and Settings\kaspersky\Local Settings\Temp\Ixtya (RANDOM)\dyzucy.exe(RANDOM)"
it is Zeus P2P Gameover (GMO) with rootkit version. Upatre execute this GMO and self deleting itself. Clean cut.

Spawned malicious processes is like this:

Invoice_040314.scr (PID: 3860 MD5: C941E2997DC2A1E39515D226E1830DB4)
    tech3.exe (PID: 1192 MD5: 984A0B8A58EA60B3376CE25692B68FA8)
        tech3i.exe (PID: 3672 MD5: 5038C8E8D2B9A00327D0CBF334223E9D)
            dyzucy.exe (PID: 1404 MD5: C7BD551912375FA2312629E070AC51F2)
                1aaa970c.sys (PID: 4 MD5: BA2B9FFB336BF5AF0247313FE2509435)
            cmd.exe (PID: 4076 cmdline: C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /c %Temp%\XNY9C82.bat MD5: AD7B9C14083B52BC532FBA5948342B98)

The Gameover

Not much to tell (kudos good people who fight this threat well!), instead is an usual installation (the batch), and drops its rootkit & hooked itself in registry, after a while it starts querying some DGA as below:

aulbbiwslxpvvphxnjij,biz                                               50.116.4.71 / li430-71.members.linode.com
behatwdxzxelembmfahkw,biz                                              198.58.99.149 / li532-149.members.linode.com.
behlznftlhyhguozcmadahadykr,info
cirwfqwscqgukqsxwonxwfatuk,info
dgmvgggqdvsxrfiwaqtsztbqt,com
empxryuofimvoztuwxdizt,org
fkrbzlcqhhmswfmcqxwxvvwmfb,biz
fmvljpnvrkwvsclztcfdrg,biz
inqstkjrucdatosodzdbmjamso,org
mbdhuzovxojtbijfifqkzpdgy,com
mbmvtofijddzkbjnbyciulf,ru
pdmifxljinvgdmxgzlimvvscuy,com
pfyplvyrvnztwuscaimffigunr,net
qkjnbenbgeqsyhhpmfpvaywcwg,org
rgpfypqszdudswglgiofjzxx,ru
roovifjnyxhqcdyeisqghpfpov,net
tovlcydmawtgpbhqttqsk,ru
vskljhldscxnaievoqk,net
xctduwmfaubminhlftcbyvojgehe,com
xyxkdmzvclnylaqeykrtougqc,info
zlhqsfqjnqwvseapwkeahegioj,com
..and as usual it sent a POST /write HTTP/1.1 (I don't go to details on these, cheers!):

Are they really changed?

Samples, Traffic and VT

Below is the sample's snapshots:

Please download via Kernel Mode-->(link)

Matrix of stages infection's detection ratio (VT)

This time I would like to make a matrix of the detection ratio of the malware by the time I analyze this sample. I used the VirusTotal (VT) scores for the comprehensive result purpose. Please be noted that VT score is based on part of signature (not overall filtration and) detection used by AntiVirus industry, so it is just not an exact measurement, but is good enough to give the idea of how is the detection on this threat by AV industry in every form of samples (during infection stages) on this infection.

The "Stages" column explained the form of the malware during the infection process as the object to be scanned by AV products. I started from the stage 1 as the email data itself, goes to the attachment in zip, PE, PE self copied after being clicked, the downloaded GMO, self-copied GMO and rootkit downloaded/used. Feel free to comment for improvement:

Stages Malware Virus Total Score
1 EML Spam file 15/51
2 Upatre SCR in attached zip 21/51
3 Upatre fake SCR the PE file 20/51
4 Upatre Self-Copied after clicked 14/51
5 Downloaded Zeus GMO 17/51
6 Self-Copy Zeus GMO after downloaded 13/51
7 Rootkit (Necurs) 15/51

So in overall we have an average score 16.42/51 or 32.21% detection ratio for this malvertisement, not so bad :-)

Where are those Spambots??

We are lunching the Upatre Spambot monitoring, these spambots are infected PC which are scattered all over the world, like below samples I tweeted:

We recorded all of the Upatre malvertisement in session with our own SMTP honeypot. We decided to share the infected IP addresses for the ISP and CERT of each country to do the clean-up. The April 2014 Statistic for Upatre spambot infected PC was released, as per announced in below tweet, we will try to manage to update this data periodically.

Video Analysis Tips and Guide

I made & upload an HD Video as a quick way of howto analyze this threat (Upatre/GameOver sets) as per seen below. I use the different set of sample and is not describing the specific sample mentioned in this or previous post, but same threat and case:

Further "rtrace" Reversing by @nullandnull


Stay safe friends. #MalwareMustDie!

5 comments:

  1. Great job

    May I ask you the .pcap file of upatre? To analyze myself the network traffic? Thank you very much.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am sorry I can not share the PCAP since it contains privacy network information too.
    You can ask me specific parts and maybe I can snap shot it for you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I would like to have just the traffic on port 443 (for research purposes). (basically ssl traffic but also with tcpstreams otherwise I have problems to reconstruct the stream).

      Thank you in advance.

      Delete
  3. I would be interested in the traffic on port 443! (I would need just the SSL handshake and the certificate). However in order to analyze it properly, I need the tcpstream as well! Would it be possible?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand what you mean. Yes, is correct.
      Next time I analyze this, I'll send you the PCAP, inform me your email address (will not be auto-published) in the reply of this comment to send the pcap,

      Delete